How Modern Is Modern Science?

Did Quantum Physics First Appear as Ancient Egyptian Temple Wisdom?

You might think that since quantum physics is a relatively new branch of science, this burgeoning “new science” phi­losophy is also new. It is not. These new insights into nature and reality are very old but have been masked by mod­ern attempts to characterize the ancient Egyptian culture and religion as primitive. The concepts of mind and con­sciousness, as well as reincarnation and evolution, were expressed long ago in what historians have labeled the “ancient mystery school”—what Schwaller de Lubicz termed “sacred science.” Although shrouded by the secrecy of the temple and rites of initiation, ancient Egyptian schools taught this secret wisdom through myth and symbolism, an approach that leads to an understanding of the world that is virtually identical to today’s new science philosophy.

In fact, the sacred science of the ancient Egyptians, best described as a philosophy of nature’s principles, inspired the Hebrews, the Greeks, the Romans, and the Christians, which led to the emergence of what we call Western civili­zation—but for us, thousands of years later, the founding knowledge of our civilization is all but lost. However, there have always been people who have handed down the secret wisdom and the sacred science of the ancient Egyptians: Kabbalists, Hermeticists, Gnostics, Sufis, Buddhists, and Alchemists. It is secret only in the sense that this wisdom must be understood through esotericism and symbol, and it’s sacred only in the sense that scientific investigation in­evitably leads to an understanding of Man, Divinity, and a unique knowledge of “Self.”

Leaving behind modern biases and looking deep into ancient Egypt’s civilization, there can be found a brilliance and understanding that rivals our knowledge today. Their “gods” were of a different order than our Western concept of God. They were not “gods” at all, but principles of nature that represented concepts like digestion and respiration. They also represented intangible qualities found in mankind, such as knowledge and personality. This ancient view of nature has been mistaken as religious and cultlike, but is, in fact, technical and philosophical.

For example, the king’s diadem, with its serpent and vulture, symbolized the principles of life and form. The ser­pent represented the concept of the Source for all that exists and its manifestation as the cosmos; and the vulture, man’s spiritual immortality. Like a spirit, the vulture, soaring high in the sky, escapes this world to an existence be­yond the bounds of Earth. Thus, the pharaoh’s diadem symbolized man’s kingship in a cosmic sense and the mystery of life’s essence, where the mystery is the reality of Cause and Effect. This mystery, which defines the human experi­ence, is abstract but operates through the concrete court of three dimensions to create another abstraction—what we experience as consciousness and self-perception.

How the ancient Egyptians developed such a refined philosophy is a mystery in itself. Scholars such as Samuel Mercer, who translated Saqqara’s Pyramid Texts during the 1950s, have noted that the tenets of this philosophy appear to have emerged fully-fledged nearly five thousand years ago, without historical precedent. It is ironic that ancient Egypt’s technical capabilities—so ambitious, so precise—also appear to have emerged, fully-fledged, without prece­dent; although we shouldn’t be surprised, since the development of a sophisticated philosophy does not occur without sophisticated technology.

Such insight into ancient Egypt’s earliest traditions moistens the seeds of doubt for history’s linear model of man and civilization—particularly so when today’s emerging “new science” philosophy parallels concepts described long ago in Ramses’ Temple of Amun-Mut-Khonsu, so meticulously described by Schwaller de Lubicz in his two volume work The Temple of Man.

In 1937, alchemist and Hermetic philosopher René A. Schwaller de Lubicz was drawn to Egypt by an inscription at the tomb of Ramses where the pharaoh was depicted as the side of a right (3:4:5) triangle. For Schwaller de Lubicz, this meant that the ancient Egyptians understood geometry’s Pythagorean theorem long before Pythagoras was born. Intrigued, he moved to Luxor and studied ancient Egypt’s art and architecture for thirteen years, concluding that the temple architecture was a deliberate exercise in proportion. The temple, in its detail, described the nature of man as a science, a philosophy that Schwaller de Lubicz termed the “Anthropocosm” or “Man Cosmos.”

Philosophy of the Anthropocosm

The question of who we are and why we are here will likely remain the ultimate mystery. Intuitively, however, this mystery can be understood upon the realization that our existence as a conscious biological form can be traced to cosmic events, and that the prerequisites for our existence can be traced to a universal state. Our Earth is dependent on the sun and the solar system in which it is gravitationally trapped; which is dependent on the Milky Way galaxy, in which it is gravitationally trapped; which is also held in place by other forces including, but not limited to, our neigh­boring galaxies. Any interruption in this line of cosmic dependency would likely result in the cessation of our exis­tence. Thus, it can be said that the cosmos is the true nature of man, and form is the sole means of its expression.

Although it seems as though we are insignificantly small compared to the rest of the universe, there is a single truth to our existence that cannot be denied and that lends credence to the abstract nature of man—the reality of the observer. We observe and perceive an ordered, yet dynamic, arrangement of energy that we naturally translate into sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch. To take away the measures of this reality means reality’s destruction, which sug­gests that the universe was never concrete in the first place. We only perceive that it is. Therefore, like Plato in his cave, we can conclude that the concreteness and form in which we live are really only the knowledge of such things. Einstein agreed implicitly in one of his famous statements: “Reality is an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.”

The most interesting question is, where does our ability to observe and perceive come from? According to physicists, it comes from an event called “state vector collapse” where all possible states of the system (the uni­verse) collapse into a single observed state.

During the 1920s, while Werner Heisenberg and Neils Bohr were further developing quantum theory, they real­ized that a new viewpoint had to be created to achieve a proper understanding of the quantum world. The classical view of a discrete world would simply not work. To accomplish this, they embraced the idea that the world is funda­mentally not a collection of discrete objects, but an indistinct, unified world of energy where, at times, discrete ob­jects are perceived. Heisenberg developed his wave matrix theory, and Schrödinger his wave mechanics, to explain their insights. Although slightly different in their approach, these two theories offered a more accurate description of the atomic structure than did classical physics.

What their theories state is that all matter exists as a wave structure that we cannot directly see. What we do see is the localization of the wave structure with its release of energy, which is a simple way to explain state vector collapse. The energy released is what physicists call a photon (a particle of light). We perceive the released energy as a particle, even though it is really a wave. This occurs for us because that is how the human brain works.

Without state vector collapse there would be no perception of separation, no form to experience and, consequent­ly, no expression. The cosmos would remain in an undefined state of absoluteness, a potential of all cosmic possibili­ties.

All matter that makes up the cosmos is actually configured energy that now exists as a result of stellar nucleosyn­thesis and supernova. Carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and other heavy elements—the building blocks of life—were created as a result of large stars collapsing under their own weight and then exploding with tremendous heat, spreading new­ly created elements into empty space to form interstellar clouds. New research suggests that even amino acids, im­portant for protein synthesis, were formed in interstellar clouds. Thus, scientists argue that since the elements that make up our bodies are the results of a cosmic process, then we are made from stardust and are literally children of the stars.

The Big Bang origin of the universe has been the model of choice for cosmologists for many decades now, but it has always been a scientific paradox. Our known laws of physics are not valid until after the moment of the Big Bang. So, how do we arrive at a universe that we experience, which sprang from nothing? Perhaps the Big Bang is only a perspective to explain the current body of scientific data and does not accurately represent actual events. As is all of nature, perhaps the universe is cyclical and oscillates between the never-ending destruction and creation of galaxies. No one really knows.

However, what we do know and can be certain of is our conscious experience. It is the one thing all six billion of us can agree upon, and the key to understanding nature. According to the Anthropocosm theory, consciousness creates a venue in order to experience, and does so through the unique quantification of its qualities. This cosmic and anthropic “new science” understanding of man puts forth the same principles that were built into the architecture of Luxor’s Temple of Amun-Mut-Khonsu.

The temple was not about the piety of a man but our solar legacy as the philosophical “Divine Man” portrayed in the great statues of Ramses—the birth of the sun. The temple was (and is) a form of communication, a lesson, and at its core its builders’ philosophy is carved in stone. Amun, Mut, and Khonsu were not “gods” in the Western religious sense, but principles that form and explain the nature of mankind as coherently as such an abstract subject can be ex­plained.

The definition of man and the story of the human experience were built into the temple architecture. Physical­ly, the temple describes the structure of man, from the importance of the femur in the creation of blood cells, to the role of the pineal gland in the brain. Spiritually, the temple conveys life’s cosmic drama and man’s spiritual im­mortality. Amun was the “Hidden One” or the “Invisible One,” best described today as the Western concept of God, omnipotent and omnipresent, or, from a scientific viewpoint, the energy field that pervades all that exists. From the ancient Egyptian point of view, Amun was self-created, the creative power and source for all that exists. Mut, which means “mother,” was Amun’s cosmic wife and the mother of the “Son” Khonsu, who represented the king.

However, the kingship of Khonsu was not a physical kingship but refers to a cosmic (or spiritual) ruler made flesh through the principles of nature. Thus, Khonsu the King represents the essence of mankind—the archetypal “Man”—and essence of all who ever lived, is alive now, and will live in the future. Khonsu, by being associated with Ra and Thoth, represented the essence of life’s energy and man’s wisdom and knowledge, where mankind is a con­sequence of the universe’s evolution culminating in the physical endowment of the universe’s self-perception. In myth, Khonsu was a lover of games but was also the principle of healing, conception, and childbirth. Literally, he was “the king’s placenta.”

Just as the ancient Uroboros—the circular serpent biting its tail—symbolizes cyclicality, through our modern sci­entific endeavors we have come full circle in understanding ourselves. No one knows for sure in what culture or at what time the Uroboros was first fashioned as a symbol, but it is one of mankind’s most ancient ones.

Plato tells us in the Timaeus that since nothing outside of the serpent existed, it was self-sufficient. Movement was right for his spherical structure, so he was made to move in a circular manner. Thus, as a result of his own limitations, he revolves in a circle, and from this motion the universe was created. From Egypt’s Ptolemaic period, the artist who drew the “Chrysopoeia [gold making] of Cleopatra” wrote within the circular serpent: The All Is One. Thus, the serpent is the ancient Egyptian symbol depicting self-creation and the source of life: “It slays, weds, and impreg­nates itself,” writes Erich Neumann in The Origin and History of Consciousness. “It is man and woman, beginning and conceiving, devouring and giving birth, active and passive, above and below, at once.”

For the ancient Egyptians, the Uroboros—the serpent—represents the creative principle of the cosmos, as well as the cosmos itself. Since the serpent’s form is singular, without appendages, but has a forked tongue and forked penis, its form is an apt symbol of creation’s initial movement from an undifferentiated state into a world of multiplicity, a movement from one to two. Schwaller refers to this as the “Primordial Scission.”

The Uroboros, however, is not just an ancient mythical symbol, nor is it the fabricated imagery of the primitive mind. Rather, it is man’s identification with the seamless, eternal state of oneness whose essence is a deep memory of an origin that words cannot explain and has to be understood through esotericism. As such, the Uroboros’ esoteri­cism is as valid today as it was at the dawn of man.

Spiritual Technology of Ancient Egypt

The Western worldview has a long history of separating the physical from the conceptual, the scientific from the religious. So together, spirituality and technology appear contradictory. This contradiction, however, is based on a naïve and exoteric view of “spirit” and “technology.”

Spirit is not some immeasurable, metaphysical thing. Rather, Spirit is the driving force behind the human experi­ence, the quest for knowledge, and the building power of civilization that can be measured by achievement. Technol­ogy is mankind’s application of knowledge into industry that provides for the civilization’s well being. Technology, which is the application of science into civil practicalities, is also the building power of civilization.

Even though technology’s final product is most evident, it is the spirit of man that turns ideas into concepts, and concepts into knowledge, which through engineering brilliance, turns science into technology and makes life more efficient and comfortable. Every product ever made began with someone’s inspiration and creativity. So, spirit and technology are really different aspects of the same human endeavor.

The desire to know inspires us, and the ever-increasing level of knowledge and technology has allowed us to reach new levels in understanding our state of existence—but what might have inspired the ancient Egyptians? Schwaller de Lubicz believed that ancient Egypt was the legacy of a technical civilization of which there is no history or knowl­edge in today’s world, a civilization for which spirit and technology were integrated into a worldview that embraced life’s mystery. For me, it is this technical and spiritual legacy that is so evident in the art and culture of ancient Egypt.

The spiritual technology of ancient Egypt expounds upon the works of Schwaller de Lubicz and tells the untold story behind the birth of the Western religious tradition. The Egyptian Mysteries, as they were called, inspired great­ness in men who instilled the concept of the Anthropocosm into our own sacred literature, and it is the same philo­sophical understanding of nature that is at the forefront of today’s “new science”; whether symbolized by the Urobo­ros or Schrödinger’s wave equation, human consciousness exists as a local manifestation of a self-perceiving universe.

Excerpted, with the publisher’s permission, from Lost Knowledge of the Ancients Edited by Glenn Kreisberg (In­ner Traditions, 2010).


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.